The Smell
So much of the enormous media noise around the instant case has to do with the smell of a decaying body which both the prosecution and the defense agreed in court was impossible to sustain for any period in time, let along months and months.
Yet the closet in which the body was supposedly decaying was about 4 feet away from the room in which all the activity (reading, sleeping, love making and desk work) took place in the apartment.
Two women testified to having spent extensive time in the apartment during the time when others reported a smell outside and in other parts of the building.
They were not restricted in their movements in any way. They smelled nothing.
Many other men and women, including a police detective, were in the apartment subsequent to the time that the Commonwealth has always insisted that the death took place.
They were not called to testify, by the defense as the time of death was fixed in stone by the indictment and their testimony would not have added anything to the situation.
There was no smell in the apartment itself.
Impossible, if a body had decayed there.
Also not a drop of blood was found in the apartment or on Holly’s clothes.
Add all this to five sightings of a dead woman 6 months after her death; The withholding of these sightings:
A judge who says ignore the time of death.
Also, during the trial, a long discussion about a fire escape next to the door – a red herring – as the actual fire escape door, in the kitchen, was left off the drawing of the apartment, by the man who spent eighteen hours in the apartment.
And the real kicker: Holly was found with keys to the apartment in her pocket.
There was no problem about bringing a body into the apartment as the deceased had keys to the apartment on her person.
The smell, as with so many other aspects of the case, does not point to the defendant, but into other directions that the neglected and now lost fingerprints reinforce.
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
UNCONSTITUTIONAL: The Einhorn Law
If you want to get anywhere, you gotta start somewhere. Take the unconstitutionality of Ira's retrial. The weirdness kicks in to over-drive, so read and remember to question authority. It's the only way. You can accept what happened and the version you know, but does that truly mean the legal system has not failed at least in some areas? The Einhorn Law is a perfect starting point because it backs off the main point just long to wonder, consider, think critically about how and why something went afoul.
1. The Einhorn Law
The law should apply to [Ira Einhorn]. It should apply not due to the fact that [he's] a good guy or a bad guy. It is applied to [him] as a citizen who lives under the aegis of a written constitution. To violate the Constitution in the way described in this article is to destroy the covenant that exists between those who are elected or hired to serve, for our benefit, and the people as a whole. It threatens the very fabric of our lives and it demeans the union of the people, by the people and for the people that so many have bleed to preserve.
It is Tyranny.
When the American political system was formulated in the Constitution, one of the strongest enabling principles was the separation of powers.
It is a principle reinforced in an early Supreme Court decision: Marbury v. Madison. It has been held as the LAW of the land since that time.
Ira Einhorn was tried in absentia in 1993.
His decision became final in 1995.
Only a court can open a final decision.
A legislative act can’t tamper with a final decision as it violates the separation of powers and makes nonsense of judicial finality.
The Einhorn Law is a travesty of American Justice.
In addition it violates the jurisdictional nature of a PCRA (Pennsylvania Court Reporters Association). Thus any decision it makes is without jurisdiction and a nullity.
The arguments put forward in response to these facts by the judge and the DA’s office have been puerile.
The Superior Court wrote a decision on the Einhorn Law that was based upon an outright lie, and so twisted a judicial principle that everyone who has looked closely at the reasoning has said: “It isn’t law.”
The Superior Court avoided a decision on the merits of the challenge to the constitutionality of the Einhorn Law by claiming that they could not grant the remedy, therefore they would not rule on the merits.
A first year law student would say: “Duh”.
One only looks at a remedy after one has made a decision on the merits.
This is how the law functions 100% of the time.
For a court to refuse to rule on the merits of an issue declares that due process does not exist for Ira Einhorn.
Pariahs need not apply.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, the final arbiter of law in Pennsylvania, has twice refused to rule on a controversial issue of outstanding public interest.
The case has received more publicity than any case in modern Pennsylvania history. It is sheer avoidance, Chief Justice Castille must be vociferously reminded that there are sins of omission as well as commission – to avoid ruling on the Einhorn Law is to diminish the meaning of law in Pennsylvania and to spatter mud upon his recent pledge that justice will be done in Pennsylvania courtrooms.
From Nayer's Blog
1. The Einhorn Law
The law should apply to [Ira Einhorn]. It should apply not due to the fact that [he's] a good guy or a bad guy. It is applied to [him] as a citizen who lives under the aegis of a written constitution. To violate the Constitution in the way described in this article is to destroy the covenant that exists between those who are elected or hired to serve, for our benefit, and the people as a whole. It threatens the very fabric of our lives and it demeans the union of the people, by the people and for the people that so many have bleed to preserve.
It is Tyranny.
When the American political system was formulated in the Constitution, one of the strongest enabling principles was the separation of powers.
It is a principle reinforced in an early Supreme Court decision: Marbury v. Madison. It has been held as the LAW of the land since that time.
Ira Einhorn was tried in absentia in 1993.
His decision became final in 1995.
Only a court can open a final decision.
A legislative act can’t tamper with a final decision as it violates the separation of powers and makes nonsense of judicial finality.
The Einhorn Law is a travesty of American Justice.
In addition it violates the jurisdictional nature of a PCRA (Pennsylvania Court Reporters Association). Thus any decision it makes is without jurisdiction and a nullity.
The arguments put forward in response to these facts by the judge and the DA’s office have been puerile.
The Superior Court wrote a decision on the Einhorn Law that was based upon an outright lie, and so twisted a judicial principle that everyone who has looked closely at the reasoning has said: “It isn’t law.”
The Superior Court avoided a decision on the merits of the challenge to the constitutionality of the Einhorn Law by claiming that they could not grant the remedy, therefore they would not rule on the merits.
A first year law student would say: “Duh”.
One only looks at a remedy after one has made a decision on the merits.
This is how the law functions 100% of the time.
For a court to refuse to rule on the merits of an issue declares that due process does not exist for Ira Einhorn.
Pariahs need not apply.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, the final arbiter of law in Pennsylvania, has twice refused to rule on a controversial issue of outstanding public interest.
The case has received more publicity than any case in modern Pennsylvania history. It is sheer avoidance, Chief Justice Castille must be vociferously reminded that there are sins of omission as well as commission – to avoid ruling on the Einhorn Law is to diminish the meaning of law in Pennsylvania and to spatter mud upon his recent pledge that justice will be done in Pennsylvania courtrooms.
From Nayer's Blog
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Article from 2002 ReTrial
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 00:23:04 -0700
By Michael A. Fletcher
And now for the toughest part of the story. Read below and insert theory as Fletcher does:
"Maddux left Einhorn in Europe and returned to the United States. Eventually, she met a new beau. When Einhorn returned home, he called her repeatedly. Finally, prosecutors say, Maddux told Einhorn that she wanted to end their relationship. He demanded that she come back to the apartment, prosecutors say, threatening to throw her belongings into the street. When she returned, she and Einhorn went to the movies. After that, she disappeared. "
By Michael A. Fletcher
"If Einhorn has changed with the times, so too, has his defense. His prominent friends have long abandoned him, and nobody seems to be buying the idea of a government conspiracy against him.
In Einhorn's new trial, Cannon plans to focus on the holes he sees in the state's case, which, he acknowledges, is substantial. "The victim's body was found in the defendant's apartment. It is the major hurdle," Cannon said. "There is circumstantial evidence of major dimension."
And now for the toughest part of the story. Read below and insert theory as Fletcher does:
"Maddux left Einhorn in Europe and returned to the United States. Eventually, she met a new beau. When Einhorn returned home, he called her repeatedly. Finally, prosecutors say, Maddux told Einhorn that she wanted to end their relationship. He demanded that she come back to the apartment, prosecutors say, threatening to throw her belongings into the street. When she returned, she and Einhorn went to the movies. After that, she disappeared. "
Websearching All Ira Einhorn
| All Ira Einhorn was found by these searches this week... | ||||
| "Jenny and the nine" | ||||
| "daniel rubin" | ||||
| Ira Einhorn polanski | ||||
| Prisoner ES6859 | ||||
| "jack sarfatti" | ||||
| ira einhorn unsolved mysteries | ||||
| einhorn podcast vzygoth | ||||
| irv homer lynn abraham | ||||
| "free love" +sixties | ||||
| ira rosen ufo | ||||
| einhorn polanski | ||||
| ira einhorn background | ||||
| einhorn et polanski | ||||
| ira einhorn | ||||
| Polanski ira einhorn | ||||
| IRA background | ||||
| peter gabriel ira einhorn | ||||
| C. Tumosa | ||||
| boyland ufo march 2010 | ||||
| ira einhorn dick | ||||
| ira einhorn stafford beer | ||||
| Theresa Duncan mystery\ | ||||
| polanski einhorn | ||||
| cia ira connection | ||||
| gorightly theresa duncan | ||||
| france polanski einhorn | ||||
| joel rosen and cohen, placitella | ||||
| mother of Ira Einhorn | ||||
| joel s rosen | ||||
| "ira einhorn" polanski | ||||
| joel s rosen attorney |
Sunday, October 17, 2010
Listserve and The Unicorn - Part Seven
And finally... this 7 part series comes to an end with a comment by our loved DC Williams. David is a stellar human with a fantastic charm.
From DC Williams....
From DC Williams....
"The only policy that will enable this corruption and skullduggery to be resolved is
by a "Truth Commission Amnesty" program analogous to what happened in South Africa
after the end of apartheid where instead of prosecuting as war criminals the
perpetrators of apartheid genocidal policies, those who accepted corrected ethic,
renouced their previous actions, and agreed to work together for the good of the
nation -- these people were pardoned and were able to apply their positions of power
and influence towards creating a better nation in the future. In America, not only
should the nonviolent victims of the drug war now imprisoned be pardoned, but also
the murderous corrupt perpetrators of the bogus drug war must also be given the
chance to change the errors of their ways and acknowledge the truth of their
misdeeds and reapply their talents and skills to solving today's global social
and environmental problems before it is too late to save all life on Earth from
otherwise impending destruction not only from accelerated climate change and the
dangers of nuclear conflagration but from the increasing ozone layer depletion that
1988 Project Earth climate modeling predictions deemed on-target as of 1997 say
will destroy all the oceanic phytoplankton (over half of Earth's oxygen supply) by
solar irradiation by the year 2008. http://www.projectearth.com To solve this
emergency we must quickly move away from fossil fuel power towards the suppressed
and available new-energy ("free-energy") technologies such as cold fusion, LENR,
ZPE, rotating magnetic systems, oscillating magnetic systems, etc etc, that can
provide power without fuel by mechanisms demonstrated but yet to be fully
understood due to corporate media and government scientific suppression. We need
a New Manhattan Project, but an open public one, to quickly implement this new
energy economy as per Science and Technology in Society and Public Policy list
posts at url below. Very important we also need to revive on a global emergency
scale level the USDA 1941-45 Hemp for Victory program to grow this most useful
and bioefficient plant everywhere possible on Earth as soon as possible for its
economic value and its superior bioefficiency per acre for biofuels applications
to replace fossil fuels, to save the forests and heal the atmosphere reducing
carbon dioxide and reoxygenating it to enable the ozone layer made from atmospheric
oxygen to be replenished in time. This is an essential Global Emergency Alert
Response. David Crockett Williams, C.L.U.
http://www.globalpeacenow.org
The Khazarian Conspiracy Video Series: Part 1 of 12
All 12 parts of this video are up and available on Youtube. It offers tremendous background information on this very relevant situation vital to the world on so many fronts...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)